The Active Network
ActiveWin Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise | VBA in Excel | Users Online: 0  
 

neowin.net

Amazon.com

  *  

  Is Microsoft toast?
Time: 06:47 EST/11:47 GMT | News Source: Financial Times | Posted By: Chris Hedlund

The US government proved that Microsoft possessed, and illegally exploited, monopoly power in the “antitrust case of the century”, the six-year action that ended in July 2004. The Final Judgment allowed Microsoft to remain whole, but imposed conditions that permit rival software makers to tuck their products into its Windows operating system. Anti-Microsoft groups were outraged; a spokesman for one said: “This decision represents the failure of antitrust laws in the high-tech industry… An unrestrained monopolist in the most vibrant sector of the economy cannot be good for America.” The critics were right: the Government’s remedies have had little impact. Yet today customers are flocking to Microsoft’s competitors. Hammered on multiple fronts by opportunistic rivals, the high-flying starship of the PC Age has stalled, and many wonder if it will now crash and burn. Compare the fortunes of Apple and Microsoft. To most, Apple is yesterday’s news, “That ‘70s Show.” But the company, despite myriad marketing blunders, has survived, and today the Mac is back. Finally price competitive with PCs, and offering software used interchangeably with other programs, the company is staging a run. Apple’s share of the US desk top computers market was up by half from 2003 to 2004.

Read Only Comments
Return to News
  Displaying Comments 1 through 11 of 11
  This is an archived static copy of ActiveWin.com.
#1 By 1401 (69.40.52.152) at Monday, March 28, 2005 06:53:01 AM
I believe a more appropriate question would be: "Is Microsoft a toaster?"

#2 By 135 (209.180.28.6) at Monday, March 28, 2005 09:38:21 AM
So the market was able to maintain competitiveness without extensive Government interference?

#3 By 9589 (66.26.227.109) at Monday, March 28, 2005 12:08:09 PM
I guess the author didn't bother to read Apple's latest 10Q report. Here are the stats that show the high end Macs are tanking (http://www.snl.com/cache/1694074.HTML). The sales and profits are coming from low end iMacs, iPod hardware and music download sales. Even software is a downer for Apple - the kind you have to pay for anyway.

All it will take is for iPod and/or music sales to slow or a better mousetrap on the x86 side to come out and it's back to Apple yo yoing in and out of profitability like they have been for the past five years.

Meanwhile, the medias' love affair with anything Apple continues . . .

#4 By 135 (24.163.245.167) at Monday, March 28, 2005 06:19:48 PM
LinuxTheft - Absolutely! We must realize that every suicide bomber is not a strike against America, but a strike for Democracy!

Oops, sorry, was getting carried away with the moment of zen.

quux - Journalism must frame the story as black versus white. It's the only way the people can understand.

#5 By 931 (67.33.130.52) at Tuesday, March 29, 2005 12:53:58 AM
wtf is wrong with your folks.. for christ sake I come here to read about technology and at worst maybe the politcs of technology... not this crap. Take to the hundreds of places on the web where this is more suited.

As to the topic: Yawn.. yet another POS article; "today people are folking to microsofts competators" ... really? (what apple's itunes?).. I didn't know ms even had a product in that market... 1+2 = 4 again.


#6 By 1124 (165.170.128.66) at Tuesday, March 29, 2005 09:39:50 AM
LinuxIsTheft,

I thought you were joking with your comment in box number 3, but now I see that you are serious. Which is very sad. Please open your eyes.

#7 By 135 (209.180.28.6) at Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:31:37 AM
csmac1344 - "More incoherence from an increasingly depraved hard Left."

Yup. That's me... The depraved hard left. Uh huh, yup. Definately.

I think maybe you need to remove your head from your lower disposal port. Just a suggestion.

LinuxIsTheft - In the end people aren't very appreciative of you doing things for them. They're far more appreciative of doing things for themselves.

It's strange. Here I am arguing conservative points of view with people who claim they are conservative but spout liberal nonsense.

#8 By 19992 (164.214.4.31) at Tuesday, March 29, 2005 12:53:53 PM
#20 In the end people aren't very appreciative of you doing things for them. They're far more appreciative of doing things for themselves.

soda, I agree with you - just look at France, they've been an emasculated, bitter country for 60 years now. I don't think you are giving the Iraqi people enough credit here. The US has certainly been a major player in Iraq for the past two (three?) years now. But, it seems that now that the Iraqis know that we aren't going to abandon them (again) they are stepping up to the plate and forging their own path.

#9 By 135 (24.163.245.167) at Tuesday, March 29, 2005 07:37:58 PM
happyguy - "But, it seems that now that the Iraqis know that we aren't going to abandon them (again) they are stepping up to the plate and forging their own path. "

I still think the most interesting aspect of modern day conservatives is how much they remind me of the bleeding heart liberals of the 1960s. The disappointing thing is how they selectively utilize this bleeding heart liberalism only in situations which are a complete waste of effort pursuing.

It'd be nice if you guys actually stood for something. Then maybe we could have an intelligent discussion.


#10 By 135 (24.163.245.167) at Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:08:32 PM
#26 - I'm still waiting for you to tell me what you actually believe in.

Let's see...

1) Bounties? Those are paid by Saudi Arabia, and yet you have done nothing to stop that.

2) Assassination? Retaliation for that was accomplished back in 1993. In fact our threat in '93 was so well understood that Iraq did not try anything remotely similar afterwards.

3) Hey, I think Iraq should become a democracy. But you can't create a democracy at the point of a gun... the people have got to want it. They've got to want it so bad that they are willing to risk their lives to attain it. Your Welfare Democracy, where you give people something thinking that's what they really need... will not work.

4) Iraq was already prevented from using WMDs through the UN sanctions. That fact is undisputed and has been confirmed in every subsequent followup report on the state of Iraq.

None of this, of course, matters to you... for you are intent only upon demonizing myself and others who disagree with your neo-Liberalism.

And again I see you go off on your childish attacks of name calling, while then proceeding to create a strawman argument in #27 which resolves into name calling.

What's the point? Your the lowest of pond scum. You're the stuff I scrape off my feet after visiting the hogs at the farm.

#11 By 19992 (164.214.4.31) at Wednesday, March 30, 2005 09:57:17 AM
soda - I still think the most interesting aspect of modern day conservatives is how much they remind me of the bleeding heart liberals of the 1960s.

How so? I thought Iraq was a bad idea. However, I've been very impressed with the response of the Iraqi people throughout all of this. I'm sorry that their joy and freedom causes you anguish, but that sounds like a personal problem there.

they selectively utilize this bleeding heart liberalism only in situations which are a complete waste of effort pursuing.


Iraqi freedom is a complete waste of effort? How so? Why? Do the Iraqis not deserve to live a life in which they need not fear having their loved ones tortured and killed? If not, why not?

It'd be nice if you guys actually stood for something.

And just who are "you guys"? Are you referring to republicans? People who live in the United States? Or are you just upset that I'm not chanting Bush=Hitler and War for Oil along with the rest of the moonbats?

They've got to want it so bad that they are willing to risk their lives to attain it.

I think the Iraqis have already proven that they want it and that they are willing to die for it. Did not the scores of people who voted despite the risk of terrorist attack.. oops, sorry I meant the revolutionaries, the Minutemen (as the michael moore libs love to call them)... prove to you that the Iraqi people are fully on board and want to be able to determine their own future?

This post was edited by happyguy on Wednesday, March 30, 2005 at 10:57.



 

  *  
  *   *
 
replica watches