Layout and usability present themselves in good manners the only think I’d have to point out here is that a watches page will open in a new tab and that’s not what I like to see. best replica handbags You will not like the outcome for sure.rolex replica uses us I would not go for “huge” but definitely a place where you will find most of the variations you’d be looking for. leaderwatches.5-carat opal ring.” fake watches he deserved the opulence he maintained in his lifetime. replica watches The signature “Francesco” ablaze in white over the black paint of the bike’s tank was the main attraction or the mere fact that the bike is owned by the Pope in the first place.fake watches This Rolex GMT Master II is one of the good looking replica watches I’ve reviewed lately As you know I’m not one of the biggest Rolex replica watches lover as I prefer bigger cases on my watches and some slightly different looks. Tags: Knock off tag heuer Breguet replica watches,cn because of the.
Microsoft Plan To Be Released
By EUN-KYUNG KIM, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - Details of a plan to break up Microsoft will be released today when the Justice Department and 19 states that successfully sued the software giant for antitrust violations submit their joint proposal on what sanctions to impose.
The remedy, which would split Microsoft into two parts, is intended to prevent the company from engaging in any illegal behavior in the future. The proposal would forbid the split companies from recombining for 10 years, according to a published report.
The proposal will be submitted after financial markets close to U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, who on April 3 ruled that Microsoft repeatedly violated federal antitrust laws intended to maintain fair competition by using its monopoly power in the operating systems market to crush rivals.
Jackson gave the government and the states the option of submitting separate briefs if they failed to agree on a remedy. Despite doubts expressed by some states on the divestiture plan, a single proposal will be filed with the court, according to people close to the talks.
``There will be one document which will be the voice for the Department of Justice and virtually all of the states,'' one source said Thursday, speaking on condition of anonymity. However, ``one or two states may choose to put in an appendix or footnotes'' to record their difference of opinion in some areas.
Microsoft has said it plans to appeal Jackson's ruling and company executives have insisted that no laws were broken. In an interview earlier this week with The Associated Press, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates said divestiture of any part of the company he founded 25 years ago would hurt consumers and be ``a very inappropriate thing.''
New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer called the recent comments by Gates, along with those by the chief executive officer, Steve Ballmer, ``fundamentally distortive.''
``The truth is that Microsoft has been a monopolist found by a federal judge to have undercut innovation and hence competition and consumer welfare,'' said Spitzer, pointing to passages of Jackson's April 3 ruling.
Microsoft has until May 10 to respond to the government's filing but has said it would request an extension to respond to a proposal as extreme as a breakup.
Under the government's proposal, one company would sell Windows, the operating system that runs most of the world's personal computers. The other would handle applications software, such as the dominant Office suite, which includes the word processor Word and the spreadsheet program Excel.
The two companies wouldn't be able to recombine for 10 years, The Washington Post reported today, quoting unidentified people who had seen the plan. Gates and his board of directors would have to create a proposal for implementing the split. Gates and other officials would receive stock in only one of the new companies, while ordinary shareholders would get stock in both.
The report said the plan would also impose three-year restrictions on the Windows company to give computer makers more flexibility to feature rival products. Microsoft would also be banned from retaliating against business partners who have resisted the company's wishes.
Justice Department officials gave an ``informational briefing'' on the proposal to White House economic advisers earlier this week ``because I think it is a significant and important case,'' Attorney General Janet Reno said.
In a separate document filed with the court Thursday, a group of prominent antitrust experts urged Jackson to order a more extreme measure - to ``clone the operating systems into three companies.''
The government's likely proposal ``is a move in the right direction, but doesn't go far enough,'' said the brief's chief author, Robert Litan, a former Justice Department official who negotiated with Microsoft in a related 1994 case and now works for the Brookings Institution.
Other authors of the report, which was not commissioned by either side, are Roger Noll, an economist at Stanford University; William D. Nordhaus, a Yale University economist; and Frederic Scherer, an economist at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government.
In addition to the government's lawsuit, Microsoft faces more than 100 private antitrust lawsuits. On Tuesday, a panel of federal judges consolidated 27 of them in a single court in Baltimore.
U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz will coordinate pretrial activities for the 27 claims, which were filed in 17 federal jurisdictions.
The private claims echo the antitrust charges detailed in the federal antitrust lawsuit but carry the potential for triple damages against Microsoft.