Microsoft Asks For Java Extension
Microsoft asked the U.S. District Court in San Jose, California, to extend the time it has to comply with a preliminary injunction requiring it to modify software that includes Sun's Java programming language.
Microsoft has filed three motions petitioning Judge Ronald Whyte for 120 days to comply with the court's order, issued on November 18. Originally it was given 90 days.
Microsoft asked for an expedited hearing on its motion for an extension, suggesting January 8.
The Redmond, Washington, software giant also asked to have the preliminary injunction clarified so that Microsoft would be able to distribute "independently developed" technology, according to Sun Microsystems.
Sun, which created the Java programming language, brought suit against Microsoft in October 1997 for allegedly violating the terms of a licensing agreement.
In granting Sun's request for an injunction, Judge Whyte found that Sun was likely to prevail and enjoined Microsoft from shipping products containing Java unless modified to Sun's approval. Microsoft was also forbidden from advertising its software as containing "official"' Java. The software giant was further required to notify customers of the order.
According to Sun, Microsoft's request for an extension was accompanied by declarations from PC manufacturers describing the time-consuming process of modifying product distribution. Most PCs ship with Microsoft's Windows 98 operating system, which contains Microsoft's implementation of Sun's Java.
Sun said in a statement it is willing to cooperate with Microsoft "to get a full understanding of what's involved in their request for additional time to comply with the order."
The Palo Alto company seemed to draw a firmer line on Microsoft's request to be able to ship "independently developed" software. "Our contract with Microsoft requires any product independently developed by Microsoft that performs the same or similar functions as the Java technology to pass Sun's compatibility test suites prior to its commercial distribution," the statement said.
Microsoft could not be reached for comment.
Sun alleges that Microsoft's Java implementation fails to pass compatibility tests required in its licensing agreement, and that Microsoft "sabotaged" Sun's Java programming language by adding Windows-dependent extensions, or programming capabilities, in violation of the license.
Microsoft argues that the contract permitted the modifications and that its products run "cross-platform" versions of Java better than any other implementation, including Sun's.
Earlier this week, Microsoft filed a notice of appeal, giving it 28 days to file an appeal brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The brief will argue that the preliminary injunction should be overturned.
|Home, Links, Awards, Help, Map, Poll, Newsgroups, Online Chat, Mailing List, Search|
|Tips & Tricks||Guides||Bugs & Fixes||Themes||Reviews||Site Contents||ActiveIE|
1998-1999 The Active Network. All rights reserved.