The Active Network
ActiveWin Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise | VBA in Excel | Users Online: 0  
 

neowin.net

Amazon.com

  *  

  The Antivirus Defense-in-Depth Guide
Time: 00:08 EST/05:08 GMT | News Source: ActiveWin.com | Posted By: Robert Stein

Microsoft Solutions for Security: The Antivirus Defense-in-Depth Guide provides an easy to understand overview of the assorted types of malware, their risks, characteristics, means of replication and payloads. The solution also details the considerations for implementing a comprehensive antivirus defense for your network, servers and clients which goes beyond simply installing antivirus software into the related tools which will help reduce your risk of infection. Lastly, the solution provides a comprehensive methodology for quickly and effectively responding to outbreaks or incidents when they occur.

Read Only Comments
Return to News
  Displaying Comments 1 through 3 of 3
  This is an archived static copy of ActiveWin.com.
#1 By 135 (208.186.90.168) at Wednesday, June 16, 2004 12:47:19 AM
Ok, found my first problem with SP2...

Norton Antivirus is conflicting with extraction of a zip file.


And latest cool thing of the week. COKE C2... half the sugar of regular coke, but still tastes good. :)

#2 By 23275 (68.17.42.38) at Wednesday, June 16, 2004 02:27:47 AM
I'm running Panda's stand alone client - Platinum 7 on one system using XP SP2 RC2 and
Panda's network client - Platinum 6, which recieves its updates and configuration via RIS on a W2K3 Domain. Neither has reflected any issues with XP SP2 RC2.

Initial attempts to install XP SP2 using Norton AV 2004 resulted in an error. Norton was uninstalled and the SP2 was installed normally. Panda was installed following that w/o error.

The Norton/Panda test was on an HP Laptop, and the network client above is a custom system [normal x86 hardware].

A third test system, also a custom system, runs CA's EZ Armor Suite and reflected no errors when installing/running XP SP2 RC1 or RC2 - just to see what would happen, RC2 was installed over RC1 - which failed. RC1 was removed and RC2 installed, normally.

#3 By 19992 (164.214.4.61) at Thursday, June 17, 2004 09:08:59 AM
I have always refused to use McAfee/NAI for an AV solution (home or business), there is just no reason for it. It doesn't catch viruses very well, and I've never been to keen on it after all those interviews with McAfee spreading all of that FUD about Michaelangelo (which led to an FBI investigation).

II normally go with SAV CE for desktops and Windows Servers
Sybari for Exchange

I don't manage the SQL or SMS boxes over here, so I'm not sure what they are running, I would assume the appropriate agent from Symantec.

As for Norton for home use, I really haven't had any issues with it. It seems to catch a larger percentage of viruses than the others do, so why switch? I'll take the performance hit in return for the piece of mind.



 

  *  
  *   *
 
replica watches