| |
|

|
|

|
|
User Controls
|
|
New User
|
|
Login
|
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
Active Network
|
|
ActiveMac
|
|
ActiveWin
|
|
ActiveXbox
|
|
DirectX
|
|
Downloads
|
|
FAQs
|
|
Interviews
|
|
MS Games & Hardware
|
|
Reviews
|
|
Rocky Bytes
|
|
Support Center
|
|
TopTechTips
|
|
Windows 2000
|
|
Windows Me
|
|
Windows Server 2003
|
|
Windows Vista
|
|
Windows XP
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
News Centers
|
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
|
Apple/Mac
|
|
Xbox/Xbox 360
|
|
News Search
|
|
XML/RSS Newsfeeds
|
|
Pocket PC Site
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
FAQ's
|
|
Windows Vista
|
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
|
Windows 2000
|
|
Windows Me
|
|
Windows Server 2003
|
|
Windows XP
|
|
Windows 7
|
|
Windows 8
|
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
|
Xbox 360
|
|
Xbox
|
|
DirectX
|
|
DVD's
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
Latest Reviews
|
|
Xbox/Games
|
|
Fable 2
|
|

|
|
Applications
|
|
Windows Server 2008 R2
|
|
Windows 7
|
|
Adobe CS5 Master Collection
|
|

|
|
Hardware
|
|
Microsoft Express Mouse
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
Latest Interviews
|
|
Mike Swanson
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
Site News/Info
|
|
About This Site
|
|
Advertise
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
Contact Us
|
|
Default Home Page
|
|
Link To Us
|


|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Time:
10:14 EST/15:14 GMT | News Source:
Microsoft Press Release |
Posted By: Byron Hinson |
|
The Anti-Spam Technical Alliance (ASTA), whose participants include Yahoo! Inc., Microsoft Corp., EarthLink and America Online Inc., today unveiled the result of more than a year of close collaboration by presenting a host of detailed best practices and technical recommendations for the entire industry in an effort to fight the scourge of spam.
|
| |
Read Only Comments
Return to News
|
|
Displaying Comments 1 through 15 of 15
|
|
This is an archived static copy of ActiveWin.com.
|
|
#1 By
1643 (204.210.30.241)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:55:40 AM
|
|
Spam is not a product or a relation of windows...get a clue kid!
|
|
#2 By
1643 (204.210.30.241)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:55:42 AM
|
Double Post.
This post was edited by humor on Tuesday, June 22, 2004 at 10:56.
|
|
#3 By
1643 (204.210.30.241)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:55:44 AM
|
Triple Post...Oops.
This post was edited by humor on Tuesday, June 22, 2004 at 10:56.
|
|
#4 By
6859 (206.156.242.39)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:22:22 AM
|
Give me a break, there are a lot of rooted linux boxes out there doing the same thing too. Plus Sendmail is responsible for lots as well.
The real people to blame are the malware coders and the retarded sysadmins that don't know how to lock down a box.
|
|
#5 By
8556 (12.217.173.227)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 12:34:11 PM
|
|
Normally, msucks is entertaining. However, his comments about spam are ignorant. Most spam is sent using Linux boxes. Does that mean Linux is responsible for spam?
|
|
#6 By
23603 (207.139.85.181)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 12:52:39 PM
|
I always wondered why msucks actually comes here?
|
|
#7 By
2960 (156.80.64.137)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 01:10:54 PM
|
He's just running up the count on this one...
TL
|
|
#8 By
19992 (164.214.4.61)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 01:11:07 PM
|
#8 "Most spam is sent using Linux boxes"
Link please
|
|
#9 By
1643 (64.73.227.129)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 01:14:22 PM
|
|
Well Linux/Unix...Sendmail has a majority out there...wouldn't you agree #11?
|
|
#10 By
19992 (164.214.4.61)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 01:16:40 PM
|
|
I'd say a good chunk of it also comes from hijacked personal computers.
|
|
#11 By
1643 (64.73.227.129)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 01:21:05 PM
|
I would concede a chunk (<5%), but not close to a good chunk. Spam is not the fault of sendmail, Microsoft, or anyone else except those that prey on the uninformed (i.e. spammers).
humor
|
|
#12 By
19992 (164.214.4.61)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 01:58:11 PM
|
#14 It's kind of hard to quantify an exact percentage of how much spam is sent from any given source (hacked windows vs. misconfigured Sendmail servers). For all I know it could be that 75% of all spam comes from windows desktops.
I'll agree that most spam passes through sendmail servers, but as for open Sendmail servers being the source of the spam, I couldn't say. Bobsireno apparantly has a report somewhere that conclusively proves this.
|
|
#13 By
1643 (64.73.227.129)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 03:34:17 PM
|
#14 & #15, I agree, I think my original point was that spam wasn't a windows problem, it's a technology problem spanning multiple vendors.
humor
This post was edited by humor on Tuesday, June 22, 2004 at 16:15.
|
|
#14 By
135 (209.180.28.6)
at
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 05:12:16 PM
|
The secret to not receiving spam is to not use email.
Of course I also get spam in my post office mailbox, and via the telephone. Although not nearly as many Viagra ads.
|
|
#15 By
1643 (204.210.30.241)
at
Wednesday, June 23, 2004 03:30:16 AM
|
But none of the boxes are checked...how is that spam?
And please state how "hotmail's the spammer email of choice"...if hotmail limits the number of email you can send daily. Wrongo again #1...please insert another quarter.
humor
This post was edited by humor on Wednesday, June 23, 2004 at 03:33.
|
|
|
 |
|