The Active Network
ActiveWin Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise | VBA in Excel | Users Online: 0  
 

neowin.net

Amazon.com

  *  

  Aero user interface has little effect on performance
Time: 01:06 EST/06:06 GMT | News Source: Ars Technica | Posted By: Kenneth van Surksum

Principled Technologies, a North Carolina-based company that conducts technology assessments, recently piloted a study for Microsoft where the performance of Windows XP Service Pack 2 was compared to Windows Vista when performing common business operations. Surprisingly (or unsurprisingly), one item the group reported was that the Aero UI had very little effect on responsiveness in Windows Vista.

The three key findings of the 47-page report (PDF) are as follows:

  1. After several common business operations, Vista was more responsive after rebooting as compared to Windows XP
  2. Generally, Vista and XP were equally responsive on most test operations
  3. Aero had little to no negative effect on the responsiveness of Vista
Read Only Comments
Return to News
  Displaying Comments 1 through 3 of 3
  This is an archived static copy of ActiveWin.com.
#1 By 3 (62.253.128.14) at Monday, January 08, 2007 01:13:48 AM
Sounds like my experience on varying computers running Aero so far.

#2 By 18033 (194.106.62.200) at Monday, January 08, 2007 09:03:23 AM
I've run Vista on several desktops and laptops and would have to agree that seems to be the case.

#3 By 8556 (12.207.97.148) at Monday, January 08, 2007 09:43:53 AM
I've seen identical (average) timings between XP and Vista, even on machines with only an Athlon 1000 as long as the video card is at least an inexpensive 128-MB AGP FX5200. Both XP and Vista with Aero run smoother and more resposively with a heftier video card, like 256-MB DDR2 PCIe-16x GeForce 6200. Since RC1 Vista has run quite well.



 

  *  
  *   *
 
replica watches