| |
|

|
|

|
|
User Controls
|
|
New User
|
|
Login
|
|
Edit/View My Profile
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
Active Network
|
|
ActiveMac
|
|
ActiveWin
|
|
ActiveXbox
|
|
DirectX
|
|
Downloads
|
|
FAQs
|
|
Interviews
|
|
MS Games & Hardware
|
|
Reviews
|
|
Rocky Bytes
|
|
Support Center
|
|
TopTechTips
|
|
Windows 2000
|
|
Windows Me
|
|
Windows Server 2003
|
|
Windows Vista
|
|
Windows XP
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
News Centers
|
|
Windows/Microsoft
|
|
Apple/Mac
|
|
Xbox/Xbox 360
|
|
News Search
|
|
XML/RSS Newsfeeds
|
|
Pocket PC Site
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
FAQ's
|
|
Windows Vista
|
|
Windows 98/98 SE
|
|
Windows 2000
|
|
Windows Me
|
|
Windows Server 2003
|
|
Windows XP
|
|
Windows 7
|
|
Windows 8
|
|
Internet Explorer 6
|
|
Internet Explorer 5
|
|
Xbox 360
|
|
Xbox
|
|
DirectX
|
|
DVD's
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
Latest Reviews
|
|
Xbox/Games
|
|
Fable 2
|
|

|
|
Applications
|
|
Windows Server 2008 R2
|
|
Windows 7
|
|
Adobe CS5 Master Collection
|
|

|
|
Hardware
|
|
Microsoft Express Mouse
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
Latest Interviews
|
|
Mike Swanson
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
Site News/Info
|
|
About This Site
|
|
Advertise
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
Contact Us
|
|
Default Home Page
|
|
Link To Us
|


|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Time:
00:00 EST/05:00 GMT | News Source:
WinBeta |
Posted By: Kenneth van Surksum |
|
Microsoft is reducing its four Windows-compatible logos, responsible for confusion and a classaction lawsuit, down to single system for consumers and partners.
Partners that want compatibility with Windows Vista's successor operating system, Windows 7, will only have to navigate a single certification program Microsoft said Wednesday, and consumers need to look for just a single sticker on their PCs, peripherals or software.
|
| |
Read Only Comments
Return to News
|
|
Displaying Comments 1 through 1 of 1
|
|
This is an archived static copy of ActiveWin.com.
|
|
#1 By
7754 (206.169.247.2)
at
Thursday, November 06, 2008 01:36:46 AM
|
"CPU idle time was down to between one and two per cent--a major niggle with Windows Vista has been the fact it freezes as it goes into CPU cycles."
The first statement is backwards, and the second makes no sense whatsoever. But no one expects knowledgeable commentary coming from The Reg, right?
|
|
|
 |
|