 |
 |
| ActiveWin | Anonymous | Create a User | Reviews | News | Forums | Advertise | VBA in Excel | Users Online: 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
User Controls |
|
New User |
|
Login |
|
Edit/View My Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Network |
|
ActiveMac |
|
ActiveWin |
|
ActiveXbox |
|
DirectX |
|
Downloads |
|
FAQs |
|
Interviews |
|
MS Games & Hardware |
|
Reviews |
|
Rocky Bytes |
|
Support Center |
|
TopTechTips |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows Server 2003 |
|
Windows Vista |
|
Windows XP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Centers |
|
Windows/Microsoft |
|
Apple/Mac |
|
Xbox/Xbox 360 |
|
News Search |
|
XML/RSS Newsfeeds |
|
Pocket PC Site |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ's |
|
Windows Vista |
|
Windows 98/98 SE |
|
Windows 2000 |
|
Windows Me |
|
Windows Server 2003 |
|
Windows XP |
|
Windows 7 |
|
Windows 8 |
|
Internet Explorer 6 |
|
Internet Explorer 5 |
|
Xbox 360 |
|
Xbox |
|
DirectX |
|
DVD's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Reviews |
|
Xbox/Games |
|
Fable 2 |
|
|
|
Applications |
|
Windows Server 2008 R2 |
|
Windows 7 |
|
Adobe CS5 Master Collection |
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
Microsoft Express Mouse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Interviews |
|
Mike Swanson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site News/Info |
|
About This Site |
|
Advertise |
|
Affiliates |
|
Contact Us |
|
Default Home Page |
|
Link To Us |
 |
Chrome 10 vs. Internet Explorer 9 Reconsidered | |
|
||
| Time: 13:00 EST/18:00 GMT | News Source: ZDNet | Posted By: Robert Stein | ||
|
When I recently took a look at the brand new Chrome 10 Web browser, the results for the latest release candidate of Internet Explorer (IE) 9 puzzled me because they were so bad. Some of my readers were more than puzzled. Some were outraged and accused me of deliberating trying to set up IE to fail. Please. I call them like I see them and, in my tests, the IE 9 RC was just dreadfully slow compared to the others. |
||
|
Read Only Comments Return to News |
Displaying Comments 1 through 4 of 4 |
This is an archived static copy of ActiveWin.com. |
| #1 By 228224 (24.200.59.136) at Friday, March 11, 2011 03:13:12 PM |
|
Unsure why people even bother using a RC in any comparison. it is not final. they haven't removed all the kinks in it.
Would you want to ben in a new jet that is a "Release Candidate"? :-) I looked at a beta in a VM that I was trashing anyways. saw it wasn't complete. Sill I poked around. And then I trashed the VM. Haven't looked at IE9 beta or RC since. |
| #2 By 16797 (193.200.150.152) at Friday, March 11, 2011 03:24:39 PM |
|
#1 Actually, repeated test showed that IE9 RC (32-bit) is faster than Chrome 10 on Sunspider test.
Originally, he used x64 (much slower, since it doesn't have optimized JS enginge). |
| #3 By 143 (216.205.223.146) at Friday, March 11, 2011 06:19:38 PM |
|
Chrome 11 Dev is surprisingly quick and stable with its new JS engine. This post was edited by donpacman on Friday, March 11, 2011 at 22:06. |
