The Active Network

Layout and usability present themselves in good manners the only think I’d have to point out here is that a watches page will open in a new tab and that’s not what I like to see. best replica handbags You will not like the outcome for sure.rolex replica uses us I would not go for “huge” but definitely a place where you will find most of the variations you’d be looking for. leaderwatches.5-carat opal ring.” fake watches he deserved the opulence he maintained in his lifetime. replica watches The signature “Francesco” ablaze in white over the black paint of the bike’s tank was the main attraction or the mere fact that the bike is owned by the Pope in the first place.fake watches This Rolex GMT Master II is one of the good looking replica watches I’ve reviewed lately As you know I’m not one of the biggest Rolex replica watches lover as I prefer bigger cases on my watches and some slightly different looks. Tags: Knock off tag heuer Breguet replica watches,cn because of the.

ActiveWin: Reviews Active Network | New Reviews | Old Reviews | Interviews |Mailing List | Forums


Product: Celeron 1.8GHz & D845GBV Motherboard
Company: Intel
Estimated Street Price:
Review By: Julien Jay

Games Benchmarks

Table Of Contents
1: Introduction
2: CPU Architecture
3: CPU Instructions & Design
4: Intel i845G Chipset
5: Intel Extreme Graphics
6: Intel D845GBV Motherboard
7: Onboard Audio
8: Synthetic Benchmarks
9: Games Benchmarks
10: Application Benchmarks
11: Conclusion


How can we do a complete processors roundup without testing them under Quake III Arena, the ultimate gamers' reference? The Pentium 4 has always exceled under Quake III Arena so it's no surprise to see the results. The various systems tested were all using an Hercules 3D Prophet II Ultra 64 MB graphics card with the latest NVIDIA 29.42 drivers. The big surprise is that the Celeron 1.8GHz falls to the bottom of the ranking with a modest results of 165.8fps showing how important the L2 cache and RAMBUS memory are for a processor.

The Intel Pentium 4 1.7GHz is slightly faster than the Athlon XP 2000+. Under Quake III Arena, the Pentium 4 2.4GHz is 26% faster than the Celeron 1.8GHz. The Athlon XP 2000+ has a comfortable advance of 16% over the Celeron.

MadOnion's 3D Mark 2001 has become an other reference when benchmarking 3D performance of PCs. We used it with our faithful Hercules 3D Prophet II Ultra 64MB. This test proves the Celeron is definitely not suitable for hard-core gamers. The Celeron 1.8GHz is beaten by the Pentium 4 1.7GHz by 11%. The Pentium 4 2.4GHz is 37% faster than the Celeron 1.8GHz.

To conclude this serie of gaming benchmark here are the results we get from AMD NBench 2.0. NBench is a program, made by AMD, that measures the ability of a CPU to render complex 3D scenes. It's obviously not optimized for the Pentium 4, and massively biased toward the Athlon. Nonetheless I thought this was interesting to publish those results.

As you can see the Athlon XP 2000+ gets kudos being 17% faster than the Pentium 4 2.4GHz and 78% than the Celeron 1.8GHz. The Celeron 1.8GHz is the last and the Pentium 4 1.7GHz outperforms it by 5%.


« Synthetic Benchmarks Applications Benchmarks »


  *   *