The Active Network
Replica watches for men Swiss replica rolex Replica watches Replica Rolex Fake Watches Replica Watch Replica watches Replica watch Replica rolex Replica watches Replica watches Replica watches Replica watches
ActiveWin: Reviews Active Network | New Reviews | Old Reviews | Interviews |Mailing List | Forums


Product: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Processor
Company: AMD
Estimated Street Price: 105/$200
Review By: Byron Hinson

F.E.A.R Benchmarks

Table Of Contents
1: Introduction
2: Setup and Components
3: Installation
4: SiSoft Sandra
5: Windows Performance
6: Windows Vista
7: Half Life 2: Lost Coast
8: Doom 3
9: F.E.A.R.
10: 3D Mark 2006
11: CineBench 9.5

12: Conclusion

F.E.A.R. is one of those titles that surprised just about everyone who played it, not only did it have fantastic and really exciting gameplay, it actually had some good AI and some great graphics to show off those fancy graphics cards and top end pc's. This benchmark is one of our own once again and we've run it against the FX-62, 6000+ X2 and the plain 4000+ AMD processors and the single Intel 955 processor. As you can see from the results, as expected the 6000+ goes into the lead with the FX-62 just behind, followed closely by the new 5000+ processor with both the Intel and lower end 4000+ AMD processor down at the bottom of the pile.

F.E.A.R. 1024x768 Maximum Detail 32-bit Colour

AMD Athlon 64 6000+
AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2.6 GHz


Intel 955
AMD Athlon 64 4000+, 2.4 Ghz


  Doom 3 3D Mark 2006


  *   *