The Active Network

Layout and usability present themselves in good manners the only think I’d have to point out here is that a watches page will open in a new tab and that’s not what I like to see. best replica handbags You will not like the outcome for sure.rolex replica uses us I would not go for “huge” but definitely a place where you will find most of the variations you’d be looking for. leaderwatches.5-carat opal ring.” fake watches he deserved the opulence he maintained in his lifetime. replica watches The signature “Francesco” ablaze in white over the black paint of the bike’s tank was the main attraction or the mere fact that the bike is owned by the Pope in the first place.fake watches This Rolex GMT Master II is one of the good looking replica watches I’ve reviewed lately As you know I’m not one of the biggest Rolex replica watches lover as I prefer bigger cases on my watches and some slightly different looks. Tags: Knock off tag heuer Breguet replica watches,cn because of the.

ActiveWin: Reviews Active Network | New Reviews | Old Reviews | Interviews |Mailing List | Forums


Product: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Processor
Company: AMD
Estimated Street Price: £105/$200
Review By: Byron Hinson

Half Life 2 Lost Coast & Half Life 2: Episode 1 Benchmarks

Table Of Contents
1: Introduction
2: Setup and Components
3: Installation
4: SiSoft Sandra
5: Windows Performance
6: Windows Vista
7: Half Life 2: Lost Coast
8: Doom 3
9: F.E.A.R.
10: 3D Mark 2006
11: CineBench 9.5

12: Conclusion

Half Life 2 has become a great benchmark to use for 3D Performance, it also uses a lot of processing power too so it is excellent for processor reviews. For this test we ran our own benchmark of the excellent Half Life 2 Lost Coast game, this uses a lot of advanced graphical features and thus is an excellent example of what difference the processors make in the game.

Half Life 2 Lost Coast - 1024x768 No AA and No AF

AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0 Ghz
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2.6 Ghz


Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965


As you can see, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ flies through this test without any problems what so ever. Not only did it do really well in the benchmark, playing the game personally was great too with no slow down during the action parts. As expected, the AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 flew through the tests getting a full 20 FPS more in the benchmark compared to the 5000+ X2, the FX-62 is an excellent choice for gamers everywhere, if a little more expensive than the 6000+

Half Life 2: Episode 1 - 1024x768 No AA and No AF

Half Life 2: Episode 1 also has some more advanced features in the game just like Lost Coast did, but as Episode one is a slightly more recent release we though we would run the same tests again to see how well the processors faired.

AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0 Ghz
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2.6 Ghz


Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965


Once again the 6000+ has shown just how well it performs here, it even manages to overtake the FX-62 in this test.

 « Windows Vista Doom 3 »


  *   *